Wildfire exposure can affect defensible-space planning, insurance availability, evacuation planning, smoke exposure, and rebuild risk.
Paradise Town Hall, 5555 Skyway Rd, Paradise, CA 95969
The overall score of 44 indicates a Moderate screening result. The main concern is concentrated in wildfire and earthquake, while the remaining modules provide lower supporting context.
Use this as a screening and prioritization report. Higher scores identify locations that deserve closer review; they do not prove site-specific damage, contamination, engineering failure, or legal liability.
All currently enabled location-risk modules returned usable results.Overall Location Risk
The overall score of 44 indicates a Moderate screening result. The main concern is concentrated in wildfire and earthquake, while the remaining modules provide lower supporting context.
Explain overall score 44 on a 0-100 scale
Top risk drivers
The strongest signals to review before making a location decision.
Earthquake exposure can affect structural retrofit needs, liquefaction questions, insurance decisions, and emergency planning.
Landslide context can affect slope stability review, drainage management, geotechnical diligence, and road or utility reliability.
Risk modules evaluated
Each module contributes to the overall score based on configured weights and data confidence.
Hydrology Risk Index: 27 (Low). Primary driver: Inside FEMA mapped flood zone X. Key amplifier: Hydrologic soil group C can increase runoff or limit infiltration. Key dampener: Higher local relief (24.4 m) supports drainage. Confidence note: No applicable containing-polygon BFE is established. Nearby BFE is context only, not the site's assigned flood elevation or a design constraint.
Severe Weather Risk: 49 (Moderate). Primary driver is Tornado; nearby history includes 14 hail reports, 12 damaging-wind reports, and 53 tornado paths within the scoring radii.
Wildfire Risk: 78 (High). The modeled location cell is Moderate; the primary driver is USDA modeled wildfire risk to potential structures.
Earthquake Risk: 71 (High). Modeled ground motion is High; the primary driver is USGS modeled ground motion.
Landslide Risk: 51 (Moderate). Primary driver is FEMA NRI landslide context; FEMA NRI rating is Relatively Moderate, susceptibility is Very Low, and nearest mapped landslide inventory feature is 2.5 miles away.
Environmental Site Risk: 20 (Low). Primary driver is regulated facility density; nearest regulated facility is 0.14 mi, nearest cleanup site is not found within 5 miles, and TRI history shows 0 reporting facilities within 5 miles.
Professional review flags
Fast scan of the diligence checks suggested by the strongest location signals.
Seismic/structural review recommended
MediumEarthquake scored 71/100; nearest mapped Quaternary fault is 5.77 mi.
Geotechnical/slope review recommended
MediumLandslide scored 51/100; nearest mapped inventory feature is 2.52 mi.
Wildfire mitigation review recommended
MediumWildfire scored 78/100; nearest mapped MTBS burn perimeter is 0.00 mi.
Hydrology Risk Index
Hydrology Risk Index: 27 (Low). Primary driver: Inside FEMA mapped flood zone X. Key amplifier: Hydrologic soil group C can increase runoff or limit infiltration. Key dampener: Higher local relief (24.4 m) supports drainage. Confidence note: No applicable containing-polygon BFE is established. Nearby BFE is context only, not the site's assigned flood elevation or a design constraint.
Confidence: FEMA confidence: High. Inside a FEMA flood polygon at this coordinate. BFE is not expected for this FEMA zone. Water confidence: High. Nearest NHD feature found and distance computed. Terrain confidence: High. Rainfall confidence: High. Soil confidence: High. NRI confidence: High.
FEMA Flood
Terrain Drainage
Surface Water
Design Rainfall
Soil Drainage
Community Context
Indicators
Detailed hydrology evidence FEMA flood, terrain, surface water, rainfall, soil, and community context
FEMA Flood
Inside FEMA zone X (outside SFHA). Review local flood conditions, insurance needs, and elevation context carefully. No applicable containing-polygon BFE is established. Nearby BFE is context only, not the site's assigned flood elevation or a design constraint.
Key facts
Indicators
Recommendations
-
Emergency readinessLowMaintain an emergency plan (evacuation routes, critical asset protection, and communications).Ref: FEMA preparedness
Terrain Drainage
Elevation 491 m. Terrain is gentle with rugged (confidence: high). Ponding susceptibility is low.
Key facts
Indicators
Recommendations
-
General storm readinessLowTerrain suggests lower ponding susceptibility. Keep basic stormwater maintenance and emergency readiness.Ref: Preparedness
Surface Water
Nearest mapped surface water is a Stream/River — Intermittent: Honey Run at 0.19 miles. This indicates conveyance-corridor exposure and possible overflow or drainage interaction during storms. This module is a mapped hydrography exposure signal and does not imply FEMA flood zone classification. Site is +87.8 m relative to the nearest water point.
Key facts
Indicators
Recommendations
-
Consider mitigation planningMediumModerate proximity to surface water. Consider runoff pathways and localized flooding potential.Ref: Risk mitigation
-
Cross-check with FEMA flood zonesLowUse FEMA flood zones as the primary flood risk indicator; water proximity is context.Ref: FEMA / NFIP
Design Rainfall Stress
Design Rainfall Stress Index: 61 (Moderate). 100-year 24-hour rainfall is 10.74 inches. 100-year 1-hour rainfall is 1.82 inches. Primary stress driver: 24-hour rainfall accumulation.
Key facts
Indicators
Recommendations
-
Include design rainfall in drainage reviewMediumRainfall stress is moderate. Combine NOAA rainfall with soil, slope, and nearby water context before finalizing drainage assumptions.Ref: NOAA Atlas 14
Soil Runoff & Drainage
Soil Runoff & Drainage Index: 29 (Low). Hydrologic group C; drainage class Well drained. Hydrologic group C with Well drained drainage indicates moderately high runoff potential. Ponding is not specifically indicated by the available gSSURGO attributes.
Key facts
Indicators
Recommendations
-
Use soil hydrology as supporting contextLowThe combined soil index is lower, but individual runoff or infiltration constraints can still matter. Missing ponding evidence does not establish absence of ponding. Review the hydrologic group and drainage attributes together with terrain and rainfall.Ref: NRCS gSSURGO
FEMA NRI Community Context
FEMA NRI Community Context: 56 (Moderate) for 002200. Flood context is Riverine: Relatively Moderate; Coastal: Not Applicable; overall community risk is Relatively Moderate. Use this as community-scale context, not a parcel flood-zone determination.
Key facts
Indicators
Recommendations
-
Keep NRI as supporting contextLowNRI community context does not materially elevate the parcel-level hydrology conclusion by itself. Use it as a portfolio and planning layer.Ref: FEMA National Risk Index
Location context and verification
Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.
Levee Context
No mapped leveed areaThe location is not within a mapped leveed area in the available data. Nearby infrastructure is listed separately; this does not establish low flood risk.
- Within a mapped leveed area
- No
- Infrastructure search
- 5 mi; no nearby mapped infrastructure found
What this means: A mapped leveed area does not guarantee flood protection. Nearby infrastructure may not protect this property. Confirm current inspections, accreditation and emergency plans with the floodplain administrator; these records do not predict failure.
Historical Insured Flood Losses
Regional history availableHistorical NFIP claim records describe flood-insurance payments in the area shown below, not losses at this property.
- Area
- Butte (county-level)
- Period
- 2021-2026; through 2026-09-08
- Years without available data
- 2021, 2022, 2023, 2026
- Payment completeness
- Some claim records have missing payment amounts; totals may understate recorded payments.
Annual regional history
| Year | Claim records | Recorded payments (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11 | $786,683.96 |
| 2024 | 7 | $381,646.98 |
What this means: These regional NFIP records are not this property's claims history and exclude uninsured and private-insurance losses. Payments are recorded dollar amounts, not total damage or inflation-adjusted losses. Missing amounts are not zero; compare incomplete years cautiously.
NFIP Policy Context
Regional history availableHistorical NFIP policy records describe insurance activity in the area shown below, not coverage at this property.
- Area
- Butte (county-level)
- Period
- 2021-2026; through 2026-09-08
- Policy dates
- Some records have unusual policy dates; verify details before interpreting annual activity.
Annual regional history
| Year | Policy records | Units represented |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (partial) | 940 | 947 |
| 2025 | 1,610 | 1,617 |
| 2024 | 1,704 | 1,711 |
| 2023 | 1,746 | 1,753 |
| 2022 | 1,886 | 1,893 |
| 2021 | 2,109 | 2,116 |
What this means: Historical policy records may include renewals and policy changes, so they do not count unique properties or policies currently in force. Units represented can include multi-unit coverage. These records do not establish this property's insurance coverage.
Coastal storm-surge planning
Outside available coverageThese storm-surge planning maps do not cover this location. This does not establish an absence of coastal flooding.
What this means: These high-tide hurricane scenarios support regional planning, not a forecast, annual flood probability, surveyed property depth or FEMA Base Flood Elevation. Follow local evacuation guidance and confirm property-specific coastal exposure.
Tsunami planning areas
Not assessedNo applicable mapped area was found in the collected source. This does not establish absence of the hazard.
What this means: These earthquake-tsunami planning maps are separate from hurricane storm-surge maps. Scenarios are not forecasts or annual probabilities, and ranges are not surveyed building depths. Follow current local evacuation instructions, including when outside a mapped area.
USGS hydrography mapping context
No mapped area at this pointNo collected incremental USGS workunit or limitation footprint overlaps this location. Existing hydrography may still be available.
What this means: These collected workunit and elevation-source footprints describe mapping coverage, not rivers, flood zones or property flood exposure. No footprint match does not mean hydrography is absent.
Flood insurance community context
Community identifiedThe location matches the community shown below. Confirm its current flood-insurance participation and any applicable CRS discount.
- Community
- PARADISE, TOWN OF
- NFIP participation
- Participating
- CRS class
- Not listed
- Potential community discount
- Not listed
- Source map date / designation
- No special flood hazard area (source designation)
FEMA community reference
| Community | FEMA community number |
|---|---|
| PARADISE, TOWN OF | 060748 |
What this means: Confirm the applicable community and current flood map with the floodplain administrator. CRS discounts depend on the policy and current community status; an unclear jurisdiction match does not establish nonparticipation.
Nearby dam inventory
Nearby dams foundThe inventory lists nearby dams within the search radius. Distance alone does not establish whether a dam could affect this property.
- Search radius
- 25 mi
- Kunkle
- 4.09 mi; hazard potential: Significant; condition: Satisfactory
- Kunkle inspection and planning
- Last inspection: 2025-10-09; emergency action plan: Yes; inundation mapping listed: Yes
- Kunkle inventory updated
- 2026-01-23
- Magalia
- 5.23 mi; hazard potential: High; condition: Poor
- Magalia inspection and planning
- Last inspection: 2025-01-16; emergency action plan: Yes; inundation mapping listed: Yes
- Magalia inventory updated
- 2026-01-23
- Concow
- 5.81 mi; hazard potential: High; condition: Satisfactory
- Concow inspection and planning
- Last inspection: 2025-10-07; emergency action plan: Yes; inundation mapping listed: No
- Concow inventory updated
- 2026-01-23
Dam inventory references
| Dam | Agency reference |
|---|---|
| Kunkle | CA00344 |
| Magalia | CA00296 |
| Concow | CA00277 |
What this means: Hazard potential describes the consequences of failure, not how likely failure is. A nearby dam does not establish downstream exposure; ask local emergency management whether an inundation map covers the property.
Ground and foundation context
No mapped karst terrainNo matching mapped geological terrain was found. This does not establish an absence of risk.
What this means: Regional mapping can identify terrain associated with subsidence, but does not establish a sinkhole or foundation problem at the property. Confirm local geology and ground conditions with a qualified professional.
Severe Weather Risk
Severe Weather Risk: 49 (Moderate). Primary driver is Tornado; nearby history includes 14 hail reports, 12 damaging-wind reports, and 53 tornado paths within the scoring radii.
Indicators
Location context and verification
Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.
Regional Severe-Weather History
Regional history availableThe area shown below has historical severe-weather reports. Counts describe regional records, not storms or claims at this address.
- Area
- Butte (county-level)
- Displayed period
- 2021-2026; NOAA source through 2026-03
- Years with no reported events in the selected categories
- 2021, 2022, 2024, 2025, 2026
Annual regional weather history
| Year / event type | Event records | Days with reported events | Reported property damage (USD) | Amount completeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 / Hail | 1 | 1 | $0.00 | Amounts available for 1 of 1 records |
| 2023 / Thunderstorm Wind | 2 | 2 | $11,000.00 | Amounts available for 2 of 2 records |
| 2023 / Tornado | 1 | 1 | $17,000.00 | Amounts available for 1 of 1 records |
What this means: These regional records do not establish events or damage at this property. One storm may generate multiple records. Reported damage is not insured loss or complete damage, and is not inflation-adjusted. Missing amounts are not zero; compare incomplete years cautiously. Reporting coverage varies.
Historical Hail Footprints
No mapped footprint at this locationNo mapped historical footprint was found at this location for the available period. This does not establish low risk.
- Source period
- 2020-10-14 through 2026-10-07
- Dates without available data
- 2020-10-01, 2020-10-02, 2020-10-03, 2020-10-04, 2020-10-05, 2020-10-06, 2020-10-07, 2020-10-08, 2020-10-09, 2020-10-10, 2020-10-11, 2020-10-12, 2020-10-13, 2021-11-20, 2026-10-08
What this means: A mapped footprint indicates historical coverage at this location, not building damage. Multiple mapped records may describe the same storm. No match does not establish absence of the hazard; observation coverage may be incomplete.
Historical Tornado Footprints
No mapped footprint at this locationNo mapped historical footprint was found at this location for the available period. This does not establish low risk.
- Source period
- Annual source files from 2010 through 2026 (2026 partial)
What this means: A mapped footprint indicates historical coverage at this location, not building damage. Multiple mapped records may describe the same storm. No match does not establish absence of the hazard; observation coverage may be incomplete.
Wildfire Risk
Wildfire Risk: 78 (High). The modeled location cell is Moderate; the primary driver is USDA modeled wildfire risk to potential structures.
Community and historical context
Indicators
Location context and verification
Use this mapped context alongside a site inspection and current local fire guidance.
Housing and vegetation setting (WUI)
Mapped settingHousing in the surrounding area is adjacent to wildland vegetation (Interface).
- Setting
- Interface
- Housing density
- 44.55 housing units/km2
- Vegetation cover
- 43.15%
- Vegetation data year
- 2019
What this means: This classification describes the surrounding census block, not conditions at the property. Vegetation and development may have changed since the source dates; confirm current conditions on site.
Modeled fire intensity, conditional on fire
Modeled intensity availableThe estimates below describe how intense a fire could be at this location if one occurs.
- Conditional flame length
- 0 ft
- Probability of flame length exceeding 4 ft, given fire
- 0%
- Probability of flame length exceeding 8 ft, given fire
- 0%
- Map resolution
- 30 m
- Landscape conditions
- 2022
What this means: These estimates describe fire intensity if a fire occurs, not the annual chance of fire or predicted damage to a building. They reflect modeled landscape conditions, not a current fire forecast.
Earthquake Risk
Earthquake Risk: 71 (High). Modeled ground motion is High; the primary driver is USGS modeled ground motion.
Community and mapped-fault context
Indicators
Location context and verification
Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.
Regional liquefaction mapping
Not assessedCGS identifies this location as unevaluated; absence of an investigation zone is not a low-hazard finding.
What this means: Regional mapping identifies susceptibility or investigation requirements, not liquefaction probability at a building. A site-specific geotechnical assessment is needed for design or a property decision.
Mapped seismic site class
Outside available coverageThe collected regional source does not cover this location.
What this means: This regional classification describes expected ground response. It is not an engineer-assigned parcel site class or a substitute for subsurface testing.
Modeled local ground conditions
Modeled estimate availableThe regional model provides an estimate of local ground stiffness, not a measured condition at the property.
- Modeled median Vs30
- 483 m/s
- Ground-condition context
- Intermediate modeled ground
- Approximate map resolution
- 900 m north-south
What this means: Vs30 describes how seismic waves travel through the upper 30 m of ground. This regional model is not a site measurement or an engineering site-class determination. Ground-motion estimates use reference ground conditions, not a property-specific soil adjustment.
Location context and verification
Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.
Post-fire debris-flow assessments
Published assessment foundThe location intersects a drainage basin in a published post-fire assessment. Any estimates below apply to the stated rainfall scenario, not an annual chance of damage at the property.
- Published assessment
- Camp (2018-11-08)
- Location match
- Assessed drainage basin
Selected published rainfall scenarios
| Assessment and rainfall condition | Conditional likelihood | Potential sediment volume | Published hazard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camp (2018-11-08): 16 mm/h over 15 minutes | 11.41% | 6,114.87 m3 | Low |
| Camp (2018-11-08): 24 mm/h over 15 minutes | 22.11% | 8,682.64 m3 | Moderate |
| Camp (2018-11-08): 40 mm/h over 15 minutes | 57.97% | 15,139.4 m3 | Moderate |
What this means: These published assessments reflect conditions at the time of assessment; vegetation recovery and later storms can change the hazard. Basin estimates do not show downstream debris paths or damage at a building. Check current local warnings and emergency guidance.
Environmental Site Risk
Environmental Site Risk: 20 (Low). Primary driver is regulated facility density; nearest regulated facility is 0.14 mi, nearest cleanup site is not found within 5 miles, and TRI history shows 0 reporting facilities within 5 miles.
Indicators
Location context and verification
Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.
Nearby Underground Storage Tanks and Releases
Nearby records foundMapped tank-facility or release records were found within the search radius. Proximity alone does not establish contamination at the property.
- Search radius
- 1 mi
- Nearby facility records
- 1
- Nearby release records
- 10
- Reported cleanup status
- Open: 0; no further action: 10; unknown: 0
- Display limit
- Nearest records shown; counts include all mapped records within the search radius.
Nearby facility and cleanup records
| Record | Distance | Reported status | Details / agency reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility: skyway mart | 0.233 mi | Open UST(s) | Tanks listed: 4; In use: 4; Closed: 0; Agency reference: CA10276198 |
| Release: HASROUN PROPERTY | 0.448 mi | No further action | Agency case: CAT0600700161 |
| Release: CHEVRON SS #97126 PARADISE | 0.455 mi | No further action | Agency case: CAT0600700013 |
| Release: HONEY RUN TIRE | 0.537 mi | No further action | Agency case: CAT10000006157 |
What this means: Nearby inventory records do not establish contamination at the property. Locations and coverage may be approximate or incomplete. 'No further action' is an agency cleanup status, not proof that all contamination is absent. Verify current conditions and relevant cleanup files before making a decision.
Public Water-System Candidates
Possible supplierService-area mapping identifies possible water suppliers. Confirm household service using the water bill or utility.
- Property supplier
- Not confirmed; check the water bill or utility
Possible suppliers (confirm household service)
| Supplier / system ID | Listed status | Service-area mapping | Water source |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARADISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT / CA0410007 | Active / Community water system | System/state service-area map; map verification incomplete | Surface water |
What this means: A mapped service area identifies a possible supplier, not confirmed service to this property. Maps may be approximate or overlap. Confirm the supplier using the water bill or utility; an absent match does not establish private-well use.
Historical Water Monitoring (UCMR 5)
Historical monitoring availableThese historical monitoring results belong to a possible water supplier, not a confirmed supplier or a current test at this property.
- Possible supplier
- PARADISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT / CA0410007
- Property supplier
- Not confirmed; check the water bill or utility
- Collection period
- 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
- Reported analytical results
- 180; detected: 0; below reporting level: 180
- PFAS results
- 174; detected: 0
Historical substance results (possible supplier)
| Substance / sample location | Results / detections | Detected range (ug/L) | Reporting level / period |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| 4:2 FTS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| 6:2 FTS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| 8:2 FTS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.002 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| ADONA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| HFPO-DA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| NEtFOSAA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| NFDHA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.02 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| NMeFOSAA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.006 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFBA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFBS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFDA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFDoA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFEESA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFHpA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFHpS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFHxA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFHxS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFMBA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFMPA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFNA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFOA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFOS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFPeA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFPeS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFTA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.008 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFTrDA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.007 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| PFUnA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 0.002 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
| lithium (not PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) | 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 | Not detected above reporting level | 9 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06 |
What this means: Confirm the water supplier before applying these historical system results to the property. They are not current household tap tests or regulatory compliance findings. Not detected means below the reporting level, not zero. Concentrations use ug/L (micrograms per liter). Consult the supplier's latest Consumer Confidence Report; missing monitoring does not establish water safety.
Radon testing context
County context availableThe county's EPA radon zone provides regional testing context, not the building's indoor radon concentration.
- County
- Butte County
- EPA radon zone
- 3
- County-level potential
- Lower potential
What this means: The historical county map does not measure radon inside the building. Elevated levels can occur in every zone; test the building regardless of its county classification.
What the strongest signals say
Mapped and contextual evidence carried forward by each enabled module.
Wildfire
CAMP
17 MTBS fires within 10 mi, 98 within 50 mi.
Earthquake
Chico Monocline fault
1 mapped faults within 10 mi, 141 within 50 mi.
Landslide
NASA
3 inventory features within 5 mi; susceptibility Very Low.
Severe Weather
Storm history
14 hail, 12 wind, 53 tornado paths within scoring radii.
Hydrology
Hydrology score
Hydrology Risk Index: 27 (Low). Primary driver: Inside FEMA mapped flood zone X. Key amplifier: Hydrologic soil group C can increase runoff or limit infiltration. Key dampener: Higher local relief (24.4 m) supports drainage. Confidence note: No applicable containing-polygon BFE is established. Nearby BFE is context only, not the site's assigned flood elevation or a design constraint.
Environmental
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC
0 cleanup sites, 345 quality-filtered ECHO facilities, and 0 TRI facility-years within 5 mi.
Recommended next actions
Same evidence, different decision lens. Use the row that best matches the person reading the report.
Buyer or investor
Use before offer terms, diligence scope, or go/no-go decisions.
Developer or operator
Use before design assumptions, site operations, or mitigation budgeting.
Lender or insurer
Use before underwriting, risk transfer, exclusions, or documentation requests.
Technical reviewer
Use to decide which specialist or source record should be checked first.
Recommendations
Practical next steps grouped from the report evidence, ordered by priority.
Review seismic due diligence before relying on this location.
Check local seismic hazard maps, adopted building code era, retrofit history, foundation type, soft-story conditions, unreinforced masonry exposure, and insurance or lender requirements.
Reference: FEMA NRI earthquake contextRequest parcel-specific seismic and geotechnical review when decisions are material.
Mapped fault proximity can indicate regional shaking potential, but site response depends on local soils, liquefaction susceptibility, slope stability, foundation design, and structure vulnerability.
Reference: USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold DatabaseReview wildfire mitigation and insurability before relying on this location.
Check local fire hazard severity maps, fire district guidance, insurance availability, evacuation access, defensible-space requirements, and recent mitigation documentation.
Reference: FEMA NRI wildfire contextInspect structure and site conditions for ember and vegetation exposure.
Prioritize defensible space, roof and gutter debris, vents, decks, attachments, vegetation near structures, and emergency vehicle access.
Reference: MTBS historical burn perimeter proximityReview current post-fire drainage and emergency guidance
Ask local emergency management or a qualified geotechnical professional whether the published assessment and possible downstream debris-flow exposure apply to the property today. Follow current weather warnings; historical basin estimates are not a property runout assessment.
Reference: https://www.usgs.gov/programs/landslide-hazards/science/postfire-debris-flow-hazard-assessment-dataVerify the housing and vegetation setting on site
Published WUI context supports reviewing defensible space, vegetation near structures, ember-resistant features and evacuation access. Confirm conditions with a qualified site professional or local fire authority; block classifications do not establish property mitigation or insurance eligibility.
Reference: https://silvis.forest.wisc.edu/data/wui-change/Review nearby UST release records
Ask an environmental professional to review state cleanup files, release status, source coordinate quality and potential pathways. Proximity and no-further-action status do not establish property contamination or its absence.
Reference: https://www.epa.gov/ust/ust-finderConfirm the water supplier before interpreting monitoring
Confirm the PWSID using the water bill or utility, then request the latest Consumer Confidence Report and relevant monitoring. Historical UCMR results are not current tap tests, compliance findings or insurance eligibility.
Reference: https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/community-water-system-service-area-boundariesConfirm flood insurance and community status
Confirm NFIP participation, the applicable flood map and any CRS discount with the floodplain administrator and your agent. The source snapshot does not determine policy pricing or eligibility.
Reference: https://www.fema.gov/cis/nation.pdfCheck dam-related inundation context
Ask local emergency management whether dam release or breach inundation maps cover the property. Nearby dam records do not establish exposure or failure likelihood.
Reference: https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/nid/Verify ground conditions for seismic decisions
For engineering or insurance decisions, use measured or locally validated ground conditions together with building type, foundation and retrofit information. This report has not adjusted ground-motion values for modeled Vs30.
Reference: https://doi.org/10.5066/P1NV6UNMTest the building for radon
Arrange an appropriate radon test regardless of the county zone. County-level potential cannot establish the building's indoor radon concentration.
Reference: https://www.epa.gov/radon/epa-map-radon-zones-0Assess financial resilience and continuity planning for earthquake disruption.
Community-scale loss and exposure can affect utilities, roads, emergency response, tenants, operations, and recovery timelines even when the parcel structure performs well.
Reference: FEMA NRI earthquake expected annual loss and exposureInspect drainage and slope indicators around the site and access routes.
Look for cracks, scarps, leaning trees or poles, seepage, blocked culverts, erosion, failed retaining structures, and recent grading or wildfire disturbance.
Reference: USGS mapped landslide inventoryReview community-scale disruption and financial exposure.
Regional landslide exposure can affect roads, utilities, emergency access, insurance, and recovery timelines even when the parcel is not directly mapped as a landslide feature.
Reference: FEMA NRI landslide exposure and expected annual lossReview wind-resilience details.
Check roof attachment, mature trees near structures, garage doors, exterior openings, and local building-code wind requirements.
Reference: SPC damaging-wind report historyAssess tornado sheltering and emergency readiness.
Confirm the property has a practical interior shelter area, emergency alert coverage, and any available safe-room or basement information.
Reference: SPC tornado path historyReview regional wildfire recurrence and operational continuity plans.
Historical burn density nearby can affect smoke, evacuation, utility disruption, and regional response capacity even when the parcel itself has not burned.
Reference: MTBS historical burn densityReview nearby regulated operations and compliance history.
Identify facility type, active status, violations, enforcement actions, toxic releases, and whether nearby operations could affect acquisition, lending, or redevelopment plans.
Reference: EPA ECHO, RCRAInfo, and TRIMaintain baseline storm readiness
Hydrology signals are comparatively limited at this location. Maintain routine drainage maintenance, site awareness, and emergency preparedness appropriate to the asset type.
Reference: PreparednessMethodology, sources, and interpretation guide
Static report guidance lives here so the main report stays focused on the decision.
Open report reference How to read, methodology, glossary, data sources, and limitations
How to read this report
Start with the decision signal, then use the evidence layers to understand what is driving the result.
Start with the top score
The Overall Location Risk score combines enabled modules into a 0-100 screening result.
Check confidence
Confidence explains whether the result is based on direct local data, fallback evidence, or broader context.
Review module drivers
Module rows show weighted contribution and the evidence behind the score, not only raw dataset values.
Use recommendations last
Recommendations translate the evidence into practical next actions for due diligence, design, or operations.
Evidence hierarchy
FEMA flood zone, SFHA, BFE applicability
Nearby NHD water and DEM terrain drainage
NOAA rainfall and gSSURGO soil behavior
FEMA NRI vulnerability, exposure, and resilience
SPC events and tropical cyclone track history
USDA modeled burn probability and structural-risk context, supported by FEMA NRI, MTBS, and California FHSZ where available
USGS modeled ground motion, supported by FEMA NRI and mapped Quaternary faults
FEMA NRI landslide context, inventory history, and susceptibility
EPA regulated facilities, releases, compliance, and cleanup context
Confidence quick guide
Strong primary evidence; optional source gaps may remain. Confidence is not a measure of safety.
Usable result with fallback, partial attributes, broader context, or one unavailable module.
Missing coverage, nearest-only interpretation, or insufficient source attributes.
How TrueViewly interprets the location
Scores are screening signals assembled from source evidence, confidence, and configured module weights.
Confidence levels
Strong primary evidence; optional source gaps may remain. Confidence is not a measure of safety.
The result is usable but depends on fallback, partial attributes, or supporting context.
Coverage is missing, indirect, incomplete, or unsuitable for strong conclusions.
Nearest FEMA polygons, missing BFE, unavailable DEM/rainfall cells, county-level NRI fallback, or unavailable modules can reduce confidence.
Scoring philosophy
- Overall Location Risk combines enabled module scores using configured weights.
- Module explanation rows show contribution to that module's score.
- Raw values, where relevant, are described inside the row explanation.
- Combined effects can add risk when multiple supporting signals align.
- Unavailable sources are excluded and available component weights are normalized rather than treated as zero risk.
- Guardrails reduce overstatement when evidence is broad or incomplete.
Hydrology remains water/flood-specific. Other modules are scored separately, then combined only in the Overall Location Risk score.
Data sources and roles
Location risk glossary
Definitions for the main datasets, terms, and screening concepts used in the report.
SFHA
FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area, generally the 1-percent annual chance floodplain.
BFE
Base Flood Elevation, the flood elevation FEMA uses for mapped floodplain context where available.
Ground-to-BFE comparison
A DEM ground estimate relative to an applicable mapped BFE, only when units and vertical datum are verified. Not surveyed building freeboard or compliance.
NHD
National Hydrography Dataset, used for mapped streams, rivers, canals, and waterbodies.
DEM
Digital Elevation Model, used for slope, elevation, and local relief context.
NOAA Atlas 14
Design rainfall estimates used to understand storm-load stress.
gSSURGO
NRCS soil survey database used for hydrologic group, drainage, ponding, and runoff context.
Hydrologic soil group
Soil runoff/infiltration class. Group A generally infiltrates better; group D generally has higher runoff potential.
NRI
FEMA National Risk Index, used here as tract/county-scale community context.
EAL
Expected Annual Loss, a FEMA NRI community-scale annualized loss estimate.
Social vulnerability
Community sensitivity to disaster impacts and recovery difficulty.
Community resilience
Community capacity to prepare for, respond to, and recover from hazard events.
SPC
NOAA Storm Prediction Center, used here for historical hail, damaging wind, and tornado reports/paths.
Hail magnitude
Source-reported hail size, generally expressed in inches.
Damaging-wind magnitude
Source-reported wind value from historical reports. Treat as event evidence, not a design wind-speed value.
HURDAT2
National Hurricane Center best-track archive for Atlantic and Northeast/Central Pacific tropical cyclones.
IBTrACS
International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship, used as a supplemental tropical cyclone track source.
WRC
USDA Wildfire Risk to Communities, used for modeled wildfire likelihood and risk-to-potential-structures context.
Burn probability
Modeled annual probability that wildfire burns a location cell. It is not a current-fire forecast or the probability that a specific structure will burn.
Risk to potential structures
A USDA WRC modeled value integrating wildfire likelihood, intensity, and generalized consequences to a potential structure at the location cell.
FHSZ
CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Where available, it provides California hazard context classified as Moderate, High, or Very High.
MTBS
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity, used here for historical mapped burn perimeter context.
Burn perimeter
Mapped boundary of a historical fire event; it is exposure evidence, not a current fire footprint.
Defensible space
Managed area around a structure intended to reduce wildfire ignition and spread potential.
NSHM
USGS National Seismic Hazard Model, used for probabilistic modeled ground-motion context.
PGA
Peak ground acceleration, expressed here as a fraction of gravity (g) for a stated return period and reference site condition.
Spectral acceleration
Modeled ground-motion response at a specified structural period. It is contextual hazard evidence, not a prediction of how a particular building will perform.
Return period
A probabilistic time interval used to describe the frequency level of a modeled ground motion; it is not a schedule or earthquake prediction.
Vs30
Average shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 meters used to describe the model's reference site condition. It is not a parcel soil measurement unless site-specific testing was performed.
Quaternary fault
A mapped fault with geologic evidence of movement during the Quaternary period, used as seismic-hazard context.
Fault class
USGS fault classification attribute. Class A generally indicates stronger evidence for Quaternary tectonic deformation.
Slip sense
General movement style of a fault, such as strike-slip, normal, or reverse.
Liquefaction
Soil behavior where saturated loose sediments can lose strength during shaking; not directly modeled by this module.
Landslide inventory
Mapped historical landslide points and polygons used for nearby event and mapped-area context.
Landslide susceptibility
Modeled relative tendency for landslide occurrence; not a parcel stability or slope-engineering determination.
Susceptibility grid
Sampled local representation of USGS raster values used for fast lookup and regional screening context.
ECHO
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online, used for regulated facility and compliance context.
TRI
EPA Toxics Release Inventory, used for latest-year and historical release reporting context.
CIMC
EPA Cleanups in My Community, used for Superfund, Brownfields, RCRA corrective action, and cleanup-site context.
Data-source appendix
What each source contributes, and where professional verification may still be required.
Important limitation
This report is not a boundary survey, engineering design, insurance determination, legal floodplain determination, weather or wildfire forecast, active-fire monitor, seismic engineering report, landslide hazard certification, Phase I environmental site assessment, contamination boundary map, geotechnical investigation, or substitute for local review.
FEMA NFHL
Regulatory flood zone, SFHA, BFE where available.
FEMA NFIP / CRS
Community participation, CRS class and discount context matched by FEMA political-area CID.
USACE National Inventory of Dams
Nearby inventory structures, hazard potential, condition and record dates.
USGS Global Vs30 Mosaic
Modeled local ground conditions and uncertainty.
EPA Radon Zones
Historical county-level radon potential with validated county matching.
USGS Karst Map
Mapped karst, pseudokarst and thermokarst geological context.
NHDPlus HR
Nearest mapped hydrographic features.
USGS DEM
Elevation, slope, local relief.
NOAA Atlas 14
Design rainfall intensity/depth.
NRCS gSSURGO
Soil runoff, drainage, ponding, infiltration.
FEMA NRI
Community risk, vulnerability, resilience.
SPC severe weather
Hail, damaging-wind, and tornado report/path history.
NHC HURDAT2 / IBTrACS
Tropical cyclone track and wind history.
USDA Wildfire Risk to Communities
Modeled annual burn probability and risk to potential structures for the location cell.
FEMA NRI wildfire
Community wildfire risk, expected annual loss, frequency, and exposure context.
MTBS
Historical burn perimeter proximity and density.
CAL FIRE FHSZ
California Moderate, High, and Very High fire-hazard severity-zone context where mapped.
USGS National Seismic Hazard Model
Modeled peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration at selected return periods.
FEMA NRI earthquake
Community earthquake risk, expected annual loss, frequency, and exposure context.
USGS Quaternary Faults
Mapped fault proximity, density, age, class, slip sense, and certainty context.
FEMA NRI landslide
Community landslide risk, expected annual loss, frequency, and exposure context.
USGS landslide inventory
Historical mapped landslide points and polygons.
USGS landslide susceptibility
Sampled modeled susceptibility grid.
EPA environmental datasets
ECHO, FRS, RCRAInfo, TRI, and CIMC facility/cleanup records.