Shared location intelligence report

Paradise Town Hall, 5555 Skyway Rd, Paradise, CA 95969

The overall score of 44 indicates a Moderate screening result. The main concern is concentrated in wildfire and earthquake, while the remaining modules provide lower supporting context.

Moderate risk Moderate risk means the location has notable signals, but they may be conditional or limited in strength. High confidence High confidence means direct local coverage and key source attributes were available. Shared Sep 14, 2026 07:31 UTC Expires Sep 14, 2027 07:31 UTC
Overall score 44
Latitude 39.74994
Longitude -121.63580
State CA
Access Read-only shared link
Decision context

Use this as a screening and prioritization report. Higher scores identify locations that deserve closer review; they do not prove site-specific damage, contamination, engineering failure, or legal liability.

All currently enabled location-risk modules returned usable results.
Executive summary

Overall Location Risk

Score 44 0-100 normalized location-risk scale

The overall score of 44 indicates a Moderate screening result. The main concern is concentrated in wildfire and earthquake, while the remaining modules provide lower supporting context.

How to read this score The 44/100 (Moderate) overall score is the weighted result of the available modules. The largest drivers are Severe Weather 49/100, Wildfire 78/100, Hydrology 27/100; configured weights are normalized when a module is unavailable.
Decision use Use this as a screening and prioritization report. Higher scores identify locations that deserve closer review; they do not prove site-specific damage, contamination, engineering failure, or legal liability.
Confidence All currently enabled location-risk modules returned usable results.
Explain overall score 44 on a 0-100 scale
Hydrology Hydrology scored 27/100 (Low) and contributes 9 points after its effective 35% normalized weight.
+9 / 35
Severe Weather Severe Weather scored 49/100 (Moderate) and contributes 11 points after its effective 22% normalized weight.
+11 / 22
Wildfire Wildfire scored 78/100 (High) and contributes 11 points after its effective 14% normalized weight.
+11 / 14
Earthquake Earthquake scored 71/100 (High) and contributes 7 points after its effective 10% normalized weight.
+7 / 10
Landslide Landslide scored 51/100 (Moderate) and contributes 3 points after its effective 6% normalized weight.
+3 / 6
Environmental Environmental scored 20/100 (Low) and contributes 3 points after its effective 13% normalized weight.
+3 / 13
What matters most

Top risk drivers

The strongest signals to review before making a location decision.

Wildfire Modeled wildfire hazard, community exposure, and historical burn context
78 High

Wildfire exposure can affect defensible-space planning, insurance availability, evacuation planning, smoke exposure, and rebuild risk.

Review defensible space, access/egress, local fire hazard maps, and insurance availability.
Earthquake Modeled ground motion, community loss context, and mapped faults
71 High

Earthquake exposure can affect structural retrofit needs, liquefaction questions, insurance decisions, and emergency planning.

Review structural age/system, local seismic design category, liquefaction maps, and retrofit needs.
Landslide Mapped landslide susceptibility and historical landslide inventory
51 Moderate

Landslide context can affect slope stability review, drainage management, geotechnical diligence, and road or utility reliability.

Review slope, drainage, retaining structures, and whether a geotechnical professional should inspect the site.
Module view

Risk modules evaluated

Each module contributes to the overall score based on configured weights and data confidence.

Hydrology 35% weight
27 Low

Hydrology Risk Index: 27 (Low). Primary driver: Inside FEMA mapped flood zone X. Key amplifier: Hydrologic soil group C can increase runoff or limit infiltration. Key dampener: Higher local relief (24.4 m) supports drainage. Confidence note: No applicable containing-polygon BFE is established. Nearby BFE is context only, not the site's assigned flood elevation or a design constraint.

Contribution 9 Confidence High Data Ready
Water-related risk can affect flooding, access, foundations, insurance, drainage design, and redevelopment cost.
Severe Weather 22% weight
49 Moderate

Severe Weather Risk: 49 (Moderate). Primary driver is Tornado; nearby history includes 14 hail reports, 12 damaging-wind reports, and 53 tornado paths within the scoring radii.

Contribution 11 Confidence High Data Ready
Severe storm history can affect roof, envelope, vehicle, crop, utility, and business-interruption exposure.
Wildfire 14% weight
78 High

Wildfire Risk: 78 (High). The modeled location cell is Moderate; the primary driver is USDA modeled wildfire risk to potential structures.

Contribution 11 Confidence High Data Ready
Wildfire exposure can affect defensible-space planning, insurance availability, evacuation planning, smoke exposure, and rebuild risk.
Earthquake 10% weight
71 High

Earthquake Risk: 71 (High). Modeled ground motion is High; the primary driver is USGS modeled ground motion.

Contribution 7 Confidence High Data Ready
Earthquake exposure can affect structural retrofit needs, liquefaction questions, insurance decisions, and emergency planning.
Landslide 6% weight
51 Moderate

Landslide Risk: 51 (Moderate). Primary driver is FEMA NRI landslide context; FEMA NRI rating is Relatively Moderate, susceptibility is Very Low, and nearest mapped landslide inventory feature is 2.5 miles away.

Contribution 3 Confidence High Data Ready
Landslide context can affect slope stability review, drainage management, geotechnical diligence, and road or utility reliability.
Environmental 13% weight
20 Low

Environmental Site Risk: 20 (Low). Primary driver is regulated facility density; nearest regulated facility is 0.14 mi, nearest cleanup site is not found within 5 miles, and TRI history shows 0 reporting facilities within 5 miles.

Contribution 3 Confidence High Data Ready
Environmental site signals can affect transaction diligence, lender review, redevelopment planning, agency-file review, and liability questions.
Expert checks

Professional review flags

Fast scan of the diligence checks suggested by the strongest location signals.

Seismic/structural review recommended

Medium
Earthquake - Structural engineer / seismic specialist

Earthquake scored 71/100; nearest mapped Quaternary fault is 5.77 mi.

Action Review building age, structural system, retrofit history, local liquefaction maps, and seismic insurance needs.

Geotechnical/slope review recommended

Medium
Landslide - Geotechnical engineer

Landslide scored 51/100; nearest mapped inventory feature is 2.52 mi.

Action Review slope, drainage, retaining structures, mapped susceptibility, and whether a geotechnical inspection is warranted.

Wildfire mitigation review recommended

Medium
Wildfire - Wildfire mitigation specialist / insurance advisor

Wildfire scored 78/100; nearest mapped MTBS burn perimeter is 0.00 mi.

Action Review defensible space, access/egress, local fire hazard maps, ember exposure, and insurance availability.

Location context and verification

Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.

Levee Context

No mapped leveed area

The location is not within a mapped leveed area in the available data. Nearby infrastructure is listed separately; this does not establish low flood risk.

Within a mapped leveed area
No
Infrastructure search
5 mi; no nearby mapped infrastructure found

What this means: A mapped leveed area does not guarantee flood protection. Nearby infrastructure may not protect this property. Confirm current inspections, accreditation and emergency plans with the floodplain administrator; these records do not predict failure.

Historical Insured Flood Losses

Regional history available

Historical NFIP claim records describe flood-insurance payments in the area shown below, not losses at this property.

Area
Butte (county-level)
Period
2021-2026; through 2026-09-08
Years without available data
2021, 2022, 2023, 2026
Payment completeness
Some claim records have missing payment amounts; totals may understate recorded payments.
Annual regional history
Historical Insured Flood Losses - Annual regional history
Year Claim records Recorded payments (USD)
2025 11 $786,683.96
2024 7 $381,646.98

What this means: These regional NFIP records are not this property's claims history and exclude uninsured and private-insurance losses. Payments are recorded dollar amounts, not total damage or inflation-adjusted losses. Missing amounts are not zero; compare incomplete years cautiously.

FEMA NFIP Redacted Claims v3 Source date: 2026-09-08

NFIP Policy Context

Regional history available

Historical NFIP policy records describe insurance activity in the area shown below, not coverage at this property.

Area
Butte (county-level)
Period
2021-2026; through 2026-09-08
Policy dates
Some records have unusual policy dates; verify details before interpreting annual activity.
Annual regional history
NFIP Policy Context - Annual regional history
Year Policy records Units represented
2026 (partial) 940 947
2025 1,610 1,617
2024 1,704 1,711
2023 1,746 1,753
2022 1,886 1,893
2021 2,109 2,116

What this means: Historical policy records may include renewals and policy changes, so they do not count unique properties or policies currently in force. Units represented can include multi-unit coverage. These records do not establish this property's insurance coverage.

FEMA NFIP Redacted Policies v3 Source date: 2026-09-08

Coastal storm-surge planning

Outside available coverage

These storm-surge planning maps do not cover this location. This does not establish an absence of coastal flooding.

What this means: These high-tide hurricane scenarios support regional planning, not a forecast, annual flood probability, surveyed property depth or FEMA Base Flood Elevation. Follow local evacuation guidance and confirm property-specific coastal exposure.

Tsunami planning areas

Not assessed

No applicable mapped area was found in the collected source. This does not establish absence of the hazard.

What this means: These earthquake-tsunami planning maps are separate from hurricane storm-surge maps. Scenarios are not forecasts or annual probabilities, and ranges are not surveyed building depths. Follow current local evacuation instructions, including when outside a mapped area.

USGS hydrography mapping context

No mapped area at this point

No collected incremental USGS workunit or limitation footprint overlaps this location. Existing hydrography may still be available.

What this means: These collected workunit and elevation-source footprints describe mapping coverage, not rivers, flood zones or property flood exposure. No footprint match does not mean hydrography is absent.

Flood insurance community context

Community identified

The location matches the community shown below. Confirm its current flood-insurance participation and any applicable CRS discount.

Community
PARADISE, TOWN OF
NFIP participation
Participating
CRS class
Not listed
Potential community discount
Not listed
Source map date / designation
No special flood hazard area (source designation)
FEMA community reference
Flood insurance community context - FEMA community reference
Community FEMA community number
PARADISE, TOWN OF 060748

What this means: Confirm the applicable community and current flood map with the floodplain administrator. CRS discounts depend on the policy and current community status; an unclear jurisdiction match does not establish nonparticipation.

FEMA NFIP Community Status Book Source date: 2026-10-04

Nearby dam inventory

Nearby dams found

The inventory lists nearby dams within the search radius. Distance alone does not establish whether a dam could affect this property.

Search radius
25 mi
Kunkle
4.09 mi; hazard potential: Significant; condition: Satisfactory
Kunkle inspection and planning
Last inspection: 2025-10-09; emergency action plan: Yes; inundation mapping listed: Yes
Kunkle inventory updated
2026-01-23
Magalia
5.23 mi; hazard potential: High; condition: Poor
Magalia inspection and planning
Last inspection: 2025-01-16; emergency action plan: Yes; inundation mapping listed: Yes
Magalia inventory updated
2026-01-23
Concow
5.81 mi; hazard potential: High; condition: Satisfactory
Concow inspection and planning
Last inspection: 2025-10-07; emergency action plan: Yes; inundation mapping listed: No
Concow inventory updated
2026-01-23
Dam inventory references
Nearby dam inventory - Dam inventory references
Dam Agency reference
Kunkle CA00344
Magalia CA00296
Concow CA00277

What this means: Hazard potential describes the consequences of failure, not how likely failure is. A nearby dam does not establish downstream exposure; ask local emergency management whether an inundation map covers the property.

Ground and foundation context

No mapped karst terrain

No matching mapped geological terrain was found. This does not establish an absence of risk.

What this means: Regional mapping can identify terrain associated with subsidence, but does not establish a sinkhole or foundation problem at the property. Confirm local geology and ground conditions with a qualified professional.

USGS Karst Map Source date: 2014

Location context and verification

Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.

Regional Severe-Weather History

Regional history available

The area shown below has historical severe-weather reports. Counts describe regional records, not storms or claims at this address.

Area
Butte (county-level)
Displayed period
2021-2026; NOAA source through 2026-03
Years with no reported events in the selected categories
2021, 2022, 2024, 2025, 2026
Annual regional weather history
Regional Severe-Weather History - Annual regional weather history
Year / event type Event records Days with reported events Reported property damage (USD) Amount completeness
2023 / Hail 1 1 $0.00 Amounts available for 1 of 1 records
2023 / Thunderstorm Wind 2 2 $11,000.00 Amounts available for 2 of 2 records
2023 / Tornado 1 1 $17,000.00 Amounts available for 1 of 1 records

What this means: These regional records do not establish events or damage at this property. One storm may generate multiple records. Reported damage is not insured loss or complete damage, and is not inflation-adjusted. Missing amounts are not zero; compare incomplete years cautiously. Reporting coverage varies.

Historical Hail Footprints

No mapped footprint at this location

No mapped historical footprint was found at this location for the available period. This does not establish low risk.

Source period
2020-10-14 through 2026-10-07
Dates without available data
2020-10-01, 2020-10-02, 2020-10-03, 2020-10-04, 2020-10-05, 2020-10-06, 2020-10-07, 2020-10-08, 2020-10-09, 2020-10-10, 2020-10-11, 2020-10-12, 2020-10-13, 2021-11-20, 2026-10-08

What this means: A mapped footprint indicates historical coverage at this location, not building damage. Multiple mapped records may describe the same storm. No match does not establish absence of the hazard; observation coverage may be incomplete.

Historical Tornado Footprints

No mapped footprint at this location

No mapped historical footprint was found at this location for the available period. This does not establish low risk.

Source period
Annual source files from 2010 through 2026 (2026 partial)

What this means: A mapped footprint indicates historical coverage at this location, not building damage. Multiple mapped records may describe the same storm. No match does not establish absence of the hazard; observation coverage may be incomplete.

Location context and verification

Use this mapped context alongside a site inspection and current local fire guidance.

Housing and vegetation setting (WUI)

Mapped setting

Housing in the surrounding area is adjacent to wildland vegetation (Interface).

Setting
Interface
Housing density
44.55 housing units/km2
Vegetation cover
43.15%
Vegetation data year
2019

What this means: This classification describes the surrounding census block, not conditions at the property. Vegetation and development may have changed since the source dates; confirm current conditions on site.

SILVIS 2020 Wildland-Urban Interface WUI classification: 2020

Modeled fire intensity, conditional on fire

Modeled intensity available

The estimates below describe how intense a fire could be at this location if one occurs.

Conditional flame length
0 ft
Probability of flame length exceeding 4 ft, given fire
0%
Probability of flame length exceeding 8 ft, given fire
0%
Map resolution
30 m
Landscape conditions
2022

What this means: These estimates describe fire intensity if a fire occurs, not the annual chance of fire or predicted damage to a building. They reflect modeled landscape conditions, not a current fire forecast.

Location context and verification

Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.

Regional liquefaction mapping

Not assessed

CGS identifies this location as unevaluated; absence of an investigation zone is not a low-hazard finding.

What this means: Regional mapping identifies susceptibility or investigation requirements, not liquefaction probability at a building. A site-specific geotechnical assessment is needed for design or a property decision.

Mapped seismic site class

Outside available coverage

The collected regional source does not cover this location.

What this means: This regional classification describes expected ground response. It is not an engineer-assigned parcel site class or a substitute for subsurface testing.

Modeled local ground conditions

Modeled estimate available

The regional model provides an estimate of local ground stiffness, not a measured condition at the property.

Modeled median Vs30
483 m/s
Ground-condition context
Intermediate modeled ground
Approximate map resolution
900 m north-south

What this means: Vs30 describes how seismic waves travel through the upper 30 m of ground. This regional model is not a site measurement or an engineering site-class determination. Ground-motion estimates use reference ground conditions, not a property-specific soil adjustment.

USGS Global Vs30 Mosaic Source date: 2026-07-24

Location context and verification

Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.

Post-fire debris-flow assessments

Published assessment found

The location intersects a drainage basin in a published post-fire assessment. Any estimates below apply to the stated rainfall scenario, not an annual chance of damage at the property.

Published assessment
Camp (2018-11-08)
Location match
Assessed drainage basin
Selected published rainfall scenarios
Post-fire debris-flow assessments - Selected published rainfall scenarios
Assessment and rainfall condition Conditional likelihood Potential sediment volume Published hazard
Camp (2018-11-08): 16 mm/h over 15 minutes 11.41% 6,114.87 m3 Low
Camp (2018-11-08): 24 mm/h over 15 minutes 22.11% 8,682.64 m3 Moderate
Camp (2018-11-08): 40 mm/h over 15 minutes 57.97% 15,139.4 m3 Moderate

What this means: These published assessments reflect conditions at the time of assessment; vegetation recovery and later storms can change the hazard. Basin estimates do not show downstream debris paths or damage at a building. Check current local warnings and emergency guidance.

Location context and verification

Additional sources provide context for due diligence. Confirm property-specific conditions and current local guidance; this information does not determine insurance eligibility, premiums or coverage.

Nearby Underground Storage Tanks and Releases

Nearby records found

Mapped tank-facility or release records were found within the search radius. Proximity alone does not establish contamination at the property.

Search radius
1 mi
Nearby facility records
1
Nearby release records
10
Reported cleanup status
Open: 0; no further action: 10; unknown: 0
Display limit
Nearest records shown; counts include all mapped records within the search radius.
Nearby facility and cleanup records
Nearby Underground Storage Tanks and Releases - Nearby facility and cleanup records
Record Distance Reported status Details / agency reference
Facility: skyway mart 0.233 mi Open UST(s) Tanks listed: 4; In use: 4; Closed: 0; Agency reference: CA10276198
Release: HASROUN PROPERTY 0.448 mi No further action Agency case: CAT0600700161
Release: CHEVRON SS #97126 PARADISE 0.455 mi No further action Agency case: CAT0600700013
Release: HONEY RUN TIRE 0.537 mi No further action Agency case: CAT10000006157

What this means: Nearby inventory records do not establish contamination at the property. Locations and coverage may be approximate or incomplete. 'No further action' is an agency cleanup status, not proof that all contamination is absent. Verify current conditions and relevant cleanup files before making a decision.

Public Water-System Candidates

Possible supplier

Service-area mapping identifies possible water suppliers. Confirm household service using the water bill or utility.

Property supplier
Not confirmed; check the water bill or utility
Possible suppliers (confirm household service)
Public Water-System Candidates - Possible suppliers (confirm household service)
Supplier / system ID Listed status Service-area mapping Water source
PARADISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT / CA0410007 Active / Community water system System/state service-area map; map verification incomplete Surface water

What this means: A mapped service area identifies a possible supplier, not confirmed service to this property. Maps may be approximate or overlap. Confirm the supplier using the water bill or utility; an absent match does not establish private-well use.

Historical Water Monitoring (UCMR 5)

Historical monitoring available

These historical monitoring results belong to a possible water supplier, not a confirmed supplier or a current test at this property.

Possible supplier
PARADISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT / CA0410007
Property supplier
Not confirmed; check the water bill or utility
Collection period
2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
Reported analytical results
180; detected: 0; below reporting level: 180
PFAS results
174; detected: 0
Historical substance results (possible supplier)
Historical Water Monitoring (UCMR 5) - Historical substance results (possible supplier)
Substance / sample location Results / detections Detected range (ug/L) Reporting level / period
11Cl-PF3OUdS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
4:2 FTS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
6:2 FTS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
8:2 FTS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
9Cl-PF3ONS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.002 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
ADONA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
HFPO-DA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
NEtFOSAA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
NFDHA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.02 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
NMeFOSAA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.006 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFBA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.005 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFBS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFDA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFDoA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFEESA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFHpA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFHpS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFHxA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFHxS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFMBA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFMPA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFNA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFOA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFOS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFPeA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.003 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFPeS (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.004 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFTA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.008 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFTrDA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.007 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
PFUnA (PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 0.002 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06
lithium (not PFAS) / Distribution entry point (not a household tap) 6 / 0; below reporting level: 6 Not detected above reporting level 9 ug/L; 2023-02-21 to 2023-11-06

What this means: Confirm the water supplier before applying these historical system results to the property. They are not current household tap tests or regulatory compliance findings. Not detected means below the reporting level, not zero. Concentrations use ug/L (micrograms per liter). Consult the supplier's latest Consumer Confidence Report; missing monitoring does not establish water safety.

Radon testing context

County context available

The county's EPA radon zone provides regional testing context, not the building's indoor radon concentration.

County
Butte County
EPA radon zone
3
County-level potential
Lower potential

What this means: The historical county map does not measure radon inside the building. Elevated levels can occur in every zone; test the building regardless of its county classification.

EPA Radon Zones Model year: 1993

What the strongest signals say

Mapped and contextual evidence carried forward by each enabled module.

Wildfire

78/100 score High risk 0.00 mi
Historical burn perimeter

CAMP

17 MTBS fires within 10 mi, 98 within 50 mi.

Earthquake

71/100 score High risk 5.77 mi
USGS Quaternary fault

Chico Monocline fault

1 mapped faults within 10 mi, 141 within 50 mi.

Landslide

51/100 score Moderate risk 2.52 mi
Inventory / susceptibility

NASA

3 inventory features within 5 mi; susceptibility Very Low.

Severe Weather

49/100 score Moderate risk 1.62 mi
Historical reports

Storm history

14 hail, 12 wind, 53 tornado paths within scoring radii.

Hydrology

27/100 score Low risk Area context
Composite

Hydrology score

Hydrology Risk Index: 27 (Low). Primary driver: Inside FEMA mapped flood zone X. Key amplifier: Hydrologic soil group C can increase runoff or limit infiltration. Key dampener: Higher local relief (24.4 m) supports drainage. Confidence note: No applicable containing-polygon BFE is established. Nearby BFE is context only, not the site's assigned flood elevation or a design constraint.

Environmental

20/100 score Low risk 0.14 mi
Cleanup / regulated facilities

NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC

0 cleanup sites, 345 quality-filtered ECHO facilities, and 0 TRI facility-years within 5 mi.

Distances are from report facts when available. Area or community context is shown when a source does not provide nearest-feature distance.
By user type

Recommended next actions

Same evidence, different decision lens. Use the row that best matches the person reading the report.

Buyer or investor

Use before offer terms, diligence scope, or go/no-go decisions.

High Review seismic due diligence before relying on this location. Check local seismic hazard maps, adopted building code era, retrofit history, foundation type, soft-story conditions, unreinforced masonry exposure, and insurance or lender requirements.

Developer or operator

Use before design assumptions, site operations, or mitigation budgeting.

High Review seismic due diligence before relying on this location. Check local seismic hazard maps, adopted building code era, retrofit history, foundation type, soft-story conditions, unreinforced masonry exposure, and insurance or lender requirements.

Lender or insurer

Use before underwriting, risk transfer, exclusions, or documentation requests.

High Review seismic due diligence before relying on this location. Check local seismic hazard maps, adopted building code era, retrofit history, foundation type, soft-story conditions, unreinforced masonry exposure, and insurance or lender requirements.

Technical reviewer

Use to decide which specialist or source record should be checked first.

High Review seismic due diligence before relying on this location. Check local seismic hazard maps, adopted building code era, retrofit history, foundation type, soft-story conditions, unreinforced masonry exposure, and insurance or lender requirements.
Action plan

Recommendations

Practical next steps grouped from the report evidence, ordered by priority.

High Earthquake

Review seismic due diligence before relying on this location.

Check local seismic hazard maps, adopted building code era, retrofit history, foundation type, soft-story conditions, unreinforced masonry exposure, and insurance or lender requirements.

Reference: FEMA NRI earthquake context
High Earthquake

Request parcel-specific seismic and geotechnical review when decisions are material.

Mapped fault proximity can indicate regional shaking potential, but site response depends on local soils, liquefaction susceptibility, slope stability, foundation design, and structure vulnerability.

Reference: USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold Database
High Wildfire

Review wildfire mitigation and insurability before relying on this location.

Check local fire hazard severity maps, fire district guidance, insurance availability, evacuation access, defensible-space requirements, and recent mitigation documentation.

Reference: FEMA NRI wildfire context
High Wildfire

Inspect structure and site conditions for ember and vegetation exposure.

Prioritize defensible space, roof and gutter debris, vents, decks, attachments, vegetation near structures, and emergency vehicle access.

Reference: MTBS historical burn perimeter proximity
Medium Additional evidence

Review current post-fire drainage and emergency guidance

Ask local emergency management or a qualified geotechnical professional whether the published assessment and possible downstream debris-flow exposure apply to the property today. Follow current weather warnings; historical basin estimates are not a property runout assessment.

Reference: https://www.usgs.gov/programs/landslide-hazards/science/postfire-debris-flow-hazard-assessment-data
Medium Additional evidence

Verify the housing and vegetation setting on site

Published WUI context supports reviewing defensible space, vegetation near structures, ember-resistant features and evacuation access. Confirm conditions with a qualified site professional or local fire authority; block classifications do not establish property mitigation or insurance eligibility.

Reference: https://silvis.forest.wisc.edu/data/wui-change/
Medium Additional evidence

Review nearby UST release records

Ask an environmental professional to review state cleanup files, release status, source coordinate quality and potential pathways. Proximity and no-further-action status do not establish property contamination or its absence.

Reference: https://www.epa.gov/ust/ust-finder
Medium Additional evidence

Confirm the water supplier before interpreting monitoring

Confirm the PWSID using the water bill or utility, then request the latest Consumer Confidence Report and relevant monitoring. Historical UCMR results are not current tap tests, compliance findings or insurance eligibility.

Reference: https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/community-water-system-service-area-boundaries
Medium Additional evidence

Confirm flood insurance and community status

Confirm NFIP participation, the applicable flood map and any CRS discount with the floodplain administrator and your agent. The source snapshot does not determine policy pricing or eligibility.

Reference: https://www.fema.gov/cis/nation.pdf
Medium Additional evidence

Check dam-related inundation context

Ask local emergency management whether dam release or breach inundation maps cover the property. Nearby dam records do not establish exposure or failure likelihood.

Reference: https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/nid/
Medium Additional evidence

Verify ground conditions for seismic decisions

For engineering or insurance decisions, use measured or locally validated ground conditions together with building type, foundation and retrofit information. This report has not adjusted ground-motion values for modeled Vs30.

Reference: https://doi.org/10.5066/P1NV6UNM
Medium Additional evidence

Test the building for radon

Arrange an appropriate radon test regardless of the county zone. County-level potential cannot establish the building's indoor radon concentration.

Reference: https://www.epa.gov/radon/epa-map-radon-zones-0
Medium Earthquake

Assess financial resilience and continuity planning for earthquake disruption.

Community-scale loss and exposure can affect utilities, roads, emergency response, tenants, operations, and recovery timelines even when the parcel structure performs well.

Reference: FEMA NRI earthquake expected annual loss and exposure
Medium Landslide

Inspect drainage and slope indicators around the site and access routes.

Look for cracks, scarps, leaning trees or poles, seepage, blocked culverts, erosion, failed retaining structures, and recent grading or wildfire disturbance.

Reference: USGS mapped landslide inventory
Medium Landslide

Review community-scale disruption and financial exposure.

Regional landslide exposure can affect roads, utilities, emergency access, insurance, and recovery timelines even when the parcel is not directly mapped as a landslide feature.

Reference: FEMA NRI landslide exposure and expected annual loss
Medium Severe Weather

Review wind-resilience details.

Check roof attachment, mature trees near structures, garage doors, exterior openings, and local building-code wind requirements.

Reference: SPC damaging-wind report history
Medium Severe Weather

Assess tornado sheltering and emergency readiness.

Confirm the property has a practical interior shelter area, emergency alert coverage, and any available safe-room or basement information.

Reference: SPC tornado path history
Medium Wildfire

Review regional wildfire recurrence and operational continuity plans.

Historical burn density nearby can affect smoke, evacuation, utility disruption, and regional response capacity even when the parcel itself has not burned.

Reference: MTBS historical burn density
Low Environmental

Review nearby regulated operations and compliance history.

Identify facility type, active status, violations, enforcement actions, toxic releases, and whether nearby operations could affect acquisition, lending, or redevelopment plans.

Reference: EPA ECHO, RCRAInfo, and TRI
Low Hydrology

Maintain baseline storm readiness

Hydrology signals are comparatively limited at this location. Maintain routine drainage maintenance, site awareness, and emergency preparedness appropriate to the asset type.

Reference: Preparedness
Reference library

Methodology, sources, and interpretation guide

Static report guidance lives here so the main report stays focused on the decision.

Open report reference How to read, methodology, glossary, data sources, and limitations

How to read this report

Start with the decision signal, then use the evidence layers to understand what is driving the result.

01

Start with the top score

The Overall Location Risk score combines enabled modules into a 0-100 screening result.

02

Check confidence

Confidence explains whether the result is based on direct local data, fallback evidence, or broader context.

03

Review module drivers

Module rows show weighted contribution and the evidence behind the score, not only raw dataset values.

04

Use recommendations last

Recommendations translate the evidence into practical next actions for due diligence, design, or operations.

Evidence hierarchy

Primary

FEMA flood zone, SFHA, BFE applicability

Site context

Nearby NHD water and DEM terrain drainage

Stress modifiers

NOAA rainfall and gSSURGO soil behavior

Community context

FEMA NRI vulnerability, exposure, and resilience

Severe weather

SPC events and tropical cyclone track history

Wildfire

USDA modeled burn probability and structural-risk context, supported by FEMA NRI, MTBS, and California FHSZ where available

Earthquake

USGS modeled ground motion, supported by FEMA NRI and mapped Quaternary faults

Landslide

FEMA NRI landslide context, inventory history, and susceptibility

Environmental

EPA regulated facilities, releases, compliance, and cleanup context

Confidence quick guide

High

Strong primary evidence; optional source gaps may remain. Confidence is not a measure of safety.

Medium

Usable result with fallback, partial attributes, broader context, or one unavailable module.

Low

Missing coverage, nearest-only interpretation, or insufficient source attributes.

Severe Weather, Wildfire, Earthquake, Landslide, and Environmental modules use historical, mapped, modeled, regulated-facility, and community-scale context as screening evidence, not deterministic forecasts, parcel inspections, engineering conclusions, or professional determinations.

How TrueViewly interprets the location

Scores are screening signals assembled from source evidence, confidence, and configured module weights.

Confidence levels

High

Strong primary evidence; optional source gaps may remain. Confidence is not a measure of safety.

Medium

The result is usable but depends on fallback, partial attributes, or supporting context.

Low

Coverage is missing, indirect, incomplete, or unsuitable for strong conclusions.

Nearest FEMA polygons, missing BFE, unavailable DEM/rainfall cells, county-level NRI fallback, or unavailable modules can reduce confidence.

Scoring philosophy

  • Overall Location Risk combines enabled module scores using configured weights.
  • Module explanation rows show contribution to that module's score.
  • Raw values, where relevant, are described inside the row explanation.
  • Combined effects can add risk when multiple supporting signals align.
  • Unavailable sources are excluded and available component weights are normalized rather than treated as zero risk.
  • Guardrails reduce overstatement when evidence is broad or incomplete.

Hydrology remains water/flood-specific. Other modules are scored separately, then combined only in the Overall Location Risk score.

Data sources and roles

FEMA NFHLFlood zone, SFHA, mapped BFE applicability and nearby contextPrimary
NHDPlus HRNearest mapped water feature and proximitySite context
USGS DEMElevation, slope, local relief, drainage shapeSite context
NOAA Atlas 14Design rainfall load for storm stressModifier
NRCS gSSURGOSoil runoff, infiltration, drainage, pondingModifier
FEMA NRICommunity risk, vulnerability, resilienceContext
SPC severe weatherHail, wind, and tornado historySevere weather
NHC HURDAT2 / IBTrACSTropical cyclone track proximity and wind contextSevere weather
USDA Wildfire Risk to CommunitiesModeled annual burn probability and risk to potential structures for the location cellPrimary wildfire
FEMA NRI / MTBS / CAL FIRE FHSZCommunity wildfire context, historical burn perimeters, and California hazard-zone corroborationWildfire context
USGS National Seismic Hazard ModelModeled reference-site PGA and spectral acceleration at selected return periodsPrimary earthquake
FEMA NRI / USGS Quaternary FaultsCommunity earthquake context and mapped fault proximity, age, class, and certaintyEarthquake context
USGS landslide sourcesInventory history and susceptibility contextLandslide
EPA ECHO / FRS / RCRAInfo / TRI / CIMCFacilities, compliance, releases, and cleanup-site contextEnvironmental

Location risk glossary

Definitions for the main datasets, terms, and screening concepts used in the report.

SFHA

FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area, generally the 1-percent annual chance floodplain.

BFE

Base Flood Elevation, the flood elevation FEMA uses for mapped floodplain context where available.

Ground-to-BFE comparison

A DEM ground estimate relative to an applicable mapped BFE, only when units and vertical datum are verified. Not surveyed building freeboard or compliance.

NHD

National Hydrography Dataset, used for mapped streams, rivers, canals, and waterbodies.

DEM

Digital Elevation Model, used for slope, elevation, and local relief context.

NOAA Atlas 14

Design rainfall estimates used to understand storm-load stress.

gSSURGO

NRCS soil survey database used for hydrologic group, drainage, ponding, and runoff context.

Hydrologic soil group

Soil runoff/infiltration class. Group A generally infiltrates better; group D generally has higher runoff potential.

NRI

FEMA National Risk Index, used here as tract/county-scale community context.

EAL

Expected Annual Loss, a FEMA NRI community-scale annualized loss estimate.

Social vulnerability

Community sensitivity to disaster impacts and recovery difficulty.

Community resilience

Community capacity to prepare for, respond to, and recover from hazard events.

SPC

NOAA Storm Prediction Center, used here for historical hail, damaging wind, and tornado reports/paths.

Hail magnitude

Source-reported hail size, generally expressed in inches.

Damaging-wind magnitude

Source-reported wind value from historical reports. Treat as event evidence, not a design wind-speed value.

HURDAT2

National Hurricane Center best-track archive for Atlantic and Northeast/Central Pacific tropical cyclones.

IBTrACS

International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship, used as a supplemental tropical cyclone track source.

WRC

USDA Wildfire Risk to Communities, used for modeled wildfire likelihood and risk-to-potential-structures context.

Burn probability

Modeled annual probability that wildfire burns a location cell. It is not a current-fire forecast or the probability that a specific structure will burn.

Risk to potential structures

A USDA WRC modeled value integrating wildfire likelihood, intensity, and generalized consequences to a potential structure at the location cell.

FHSZ

CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Where available, it provides California hazard context classified as Moderate, High, or Very High.

MTBS

Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity, used here for historical mapped burn perimeter context.

Burn perimeter

Mapped boundary of a historical fire event; it is exposure evidence, not a current fire footprint.

Defensible space

Managed area around a structure intended to reduce wildfire ignition and spread potential.

NSHM

USGS National Seismic Hazard Model, used for probabilistic modeled ground-motion context.

PGA

Peak ground acceleration, expressed here as a fraction of gravity (g) for a stated return period and reference site condition.

Spectral acceleration

Modeled ground-motion response at a specified structural period. It is contextual hazard evidence, not a prediction of how a particular building will perform.

Return period

A probabilistic time interval used to describe the frequency level of a modeled ground motion; it is not a schedule or earthquake prediction.

Vs30

Average shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 meters used to describe the model's reference site condition. It is not a parcel soil measurement unless site-specific testing was performed.

Quaternary fault

A mapped fault with geologic evidence of movement during the Quaternary period, used as seismic-hazard context.

Fault class

USGS fault classification attribute. Class A generally indicates stronger evidence for Quaternary tectonic deformation.

Slip sense

General movement style of a fault, such as strike-slip, normal, or reverse.

Liquefaction

Soil behavior where saturated loose sediments can lose strength during shaking; not directly modeled by this module.

Landslide inventory

Mapped historical landslide points and polygons used for nearby event and mapped-area context.

Landslide susceptibility

Modeled relative tendency for landslide occurrence; not a parcel stability or slope-engineering determination.

Susceptibility grid

Sampled local representation of USGS raster values used for fast lookup and regional screening context.

ECHO

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online, used for regulated facility and compliance context.

TRI

EPA Toxics Release Inventory, used for latest-year and historical release reporting context.

CIMC

EPA Cleanups in My Community, used for Superfund, Brownfields, RCRA corrective action, and cleanup-site context.

Data-source appendix

What each source contributes, and where professional verification may still be required.

Important limitation

This report is not a boundary survey, engineering design, insurance determination, legal floodplain determination, weather or wildfire forecast, active-fire monitor, seismic engineering report, landslide hazard certification, Phase I environmental site assessment, contamination boundary map, geotechnical investigation, or substitute for local review.

FEMA NFHL

Regulatory flood zone, SFHA, BFE where available.

Limitation: Local map updates and unmapped areas may exist.

FEMA NFIP / CRS

Community participation, CRS class and discount context matched by FEMA political-area CID.

Limitation: Dated snapshot; overlapping or missing boundaries require local verification. Does not determine policy pricing or eligibility.

USACE National Inventory of Dams

Nearby inventory structures, hazard potential, condition and record dates.

Limitation: Hazard potential describes consequences, not failure probability; proximity does not establish downstream inundation.

USGS Global Vs30 Mosaic

Modeled local ground conditions and uncertainty.

Limitation: Coarse modeled estimate; existing NSHM values retain their reference site condition and are not soil-adjusted.

EPA Radon Zones

Historical county-level radon potential with validated county matching.

Limitation: Not a building measurement. Test every building regardless of zone; some historical counties remain unmatched.

USGS Karst Map

Mapped karst, pseudokarst and thermokarst geological context.

Limitation: Regional geology does not establish sinkhole occurrence, collapse probability or foundation condition.

NHDPlus HR

Nearest mapped hydrographic features.

Limitation: Not a hydraulic model and may omit local drainage structures.

USGS DEM

Elevation, slope, local relief.

Limitation: Resolution and vertical accuracy are not survey-grade.

NOAA Atlas 14

Design rainfall intensity/depth.

Limitation: Rainfall load does not prove site flooding by itself.

NRCS gSSURGO

Soil runoff, drainage, ponding, infiltration.

Limitation: Map-unit attributes are generalized.

FEMA NRI

Community risk, vulnerability, resilience.

Limitation: Tract/county scale, not parcel-specific.

SPC severe weather

Hail, damaging-wind, and tornado report/path history.

Limitation: Historical reports reflect observed/reported events and reporting density, not a site-specific forecast.

NHC HURDAT2 / IBTrACS

Tropical cyclone track and wind history.

Limitation: Track proximity does not model parcel-level wind loading, surge, rainfall flooding, or building performance.

USDA Wildfire Risk to Communities

Modeled annual burn probability and risk to potential structures for the location cell.

Limitation: Nationally consistent modeled data are not locally calibrated, do not describe current fire danger, and do not replace parcel-level fuels, structure, or defensible-space assessment.

FEMA NRI wildfire

Community wildfire risk, expected annual loss, frequency, and exposure context.

Limitation: Community-scale, not parcel-specific fuels or defensible-space evidence.

MTBS

Historical burn perimeter proximity and density.

Limitation: Mapped historical burns do not predict active fire behavior or current vegetation condition.

CAL FIRE FHSZ

California Moderate, High, and Very High fire-hazard severity-zone context where mapped.

Limitation: Hazard-zone context is not an insurance-rate, structure-vulnerability, or parcel-condition determination.

USGS National Seismic Hazard Model

Modeled peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration at selected return periods.

Limitation: Values use the dataset reference site condition and do not model parcel soils, liquefaction, foundation behavior, or structure performance.

FEMA NRI earthquake

Community earthquake risk, expected annual loss, frequency, and exposure context.

Limitation: Community-scale, not parcel-specific structural vulnerability.

USGS Quaternary Faults

Mapped fault proximity, density, age, class, slip sense, and certainty context.

Limitation: Does not model parcel-level shaking, liquefaction, landslide, soils, or building performance.

FEMA NRI landslide

Community landslide risk, expected annual loss, frequency, and exposure context.

Limitation: Community-scale, not parcel-specific slope stability.

USGS landslide inventory

Historical mapped landslide points and polygons.

Limitation: Inventory completeness varies by mapping effort and does not predict future movement.

USGS landslide susceptibility

Sampled modeled susceptibility grid.

Limitation: Screening context only; not a geotechnical site investigation.

EPA environmental datasets

ECHO, FRS, RCRAInfo, TRI, and CIMC facility/cleanup records.

Limitation: Screening context only; not a Phase I ESA, contamination boundary, vapor-intrusion model, or liability determination.